Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Bounded by: Tulane Avenue, S. Rocheblave Street, Canal Street, and S. Claiborne Ave./I-10
New Orleans, Lousiana
Documenting the Lower Mid-City footprint of the proposed LSU-VA Hospital
The Proposed Footprint
Bounded by: Tulane Avenue, S. Rocheblave Street, Canal Street, and S. Claiborne Ave./I-10
Our Purpose
A statement at the outset
Disclaimer: This blog represents - and always has represented - the personal views of the posters only. It does not represent the views of their employers, any groups they belong to, etc.
All images, except where noted, Copyright © 2009-2014 Inside the Footprint. For permission to use images or excerpts, please contact me via the email address in my profile. Any use of content from this blog must be attributed.
All images, except where noted, Copyright © 2009-2014 Inside the Footprint. For permission to use images or excerpts, please contact me via the email address in my profile. Any use of content from this blog must be attributed.
Property Acquisition Costs to Taxpayers
Blogroll
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(545)
-
▼
June
(61)
- That Tired Old Spin
- "No Significant Impact"
- Copper heading out of McDonogh No. 11 School
- Driven Out - the final resident has departed the L...
- 212 S. Johnson - demolished this morning
- UMC House Moves - Note
- A Happy Story
- McDonogh Boarded
- What's Left in the LSU Footprint
- The City's take on HCR-59
- AP gets its slant on
- HCR-59 Update
- "somebody's going broke"
- Displaced, Demolished
- Driving old Dixieland Down
- HCR-59 rescheduled for debate today
- Support HCR-59 - Sign Here
- A Letter from Sandra
- A way to support greater legislative oversight of ...
- Giddyap
- Still Watching Dixie
- Press Conference on UMC Scheduled for Today, Thurs...
- Where is he getting those numbers?
- House Speaker Tucker on the UMC
- Click to Enlarge - And Never Forget
- Treasurer Kennedy on the UMC Situation
- Contact your LA State Representative Today
- Mayor: Any talk of retrofitting Charity is "bad"
- The Latest Vitter Letter
- 2104 Cleveland Avenue
- UMC Situation: Now More Fluid Than Ever
- CityBusiness on HCR-59
- Vitter/Tucker/Kennedy issue a new press release
- HCR-59 Passes out of House Appropriations Committee
- Still Standing
- In the legislature tomorrow
- Absolutely Not - WWLTV gets multiple facts wrong i...
- Mid-Century Modern
- Not True
- Misleading
- "The existing project is large, cumbersome and I'm...
- From the Baton Rouge Business Report
- A Bad Sign
- The Idiocy Continues - State, UMC, Jacobs, subs pr...
- A picayune for your thoughts
- Clancy DuBos gets it wrong
- More on the Vitter/Kennedy/Tucker UMC Proposal
- BOMBSHELL: Vitter, Kennedy, and Tucker Send Altern...
- Geometrics
- Out of sight
- Strange Views
- "HOSPITAL FINANCING LIKELY PRIVATE"
- UMC financing remains wreathed in crippling uncert...
- "Report: Proposed hospital needs fewer beds"
- "the council gives up the city's ownership of the ...
- "there's a lot of risks out there"
- From a Facebook Comment
- "Before the hospital board met the New Orleans Cit...
- City Council Revokes the Streets in UMC Footprint ...
- Eaved Cottage and Smashed Gate
- That Deutsches Haus View
-
▼
June
(61)
Followers
Sitemeter
Copyright 2011
All images copyrighted 2011. Please contact Brad V for permission at his profile email address before using photos on this site, especially if the intended use is for any form of financial gain.
2 comments:
If it is privately financed, doesn't that open the project up to even more expropriation lawsuits because private property will have been expropriated with public monies for private re-development?
It certainly does raise questions - and issues that have already been asserted in different forms in the various legal cases in progress over expropriations. It likely hinges on the exact degree of control and involvement by the private entities that might be involved. And how courts view the nature of the UMC Board itself.
The state itself has continuously hedged its talk of placing retail along the Canal and Tulane faces of the UMC site (because the city demanded retail "activation" of the streetscapes)...by noting that it will do so if legally permissible.
Post a Comment